Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 41,869
Aragones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Nelson Aragones
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Escamilla v. Judge Medrano
as 3:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jorge Melenudo Escamilla
Respondent:
Judge Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Tyroch et al
as 6:2024cv00224
Petitioner:
Christopher Jenkins
Respondent:
Melissa Tyroch and Steve Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1072
as 3:2024cv01072
Petitioner:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Respondent:
FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1072
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Hamilton
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hurley v. TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Freddy Hurley
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v TDCJ Director
as 6:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. TDCJ
as 3:2024cv01038
Petitioner:
MonQuas Barnes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Douglas Ray Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
