Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 42,717
Manrique v. Tate
as 4:2024cv05127
Respondent:
Mr. Randy Tate
Petitioner:
Edson Manrique
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tyler v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv05150
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Michael Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. McNamara
as 6:2024cv00650
Respondent:
Sheriff Parnell McNamara
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Milhouse v. FMC Carswell et al
as 4:2024cv01264
Respondent:
Unit Team Staff, Warden FNU Rule and FMC Carswell
Petitioner:
Patricia Milhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Adair v. Grant
as 3:2024cv03257
Petitioner:
Raymond C Adair
Respondent:
Dr Scarlet Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Maciel v. LNU, Hale County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00279
Petitioner:
Adrian Maciel
Respondent:
FNU LNU 524CV279
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tompkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00265
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
John David Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Warden, SFF Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00277
Petitioner:
Yesenia Flores
Respondent:
FNU 524CV277 LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tompkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00215
Petitioner:
John David Tompkins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Facility Director Leidel Residential Reentry Center
as 4:2024cv05087
Petitioner:
Dusten James Miller
Respondent:
Facility Director Leidel Residential Reentry Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
