Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 42,580
Sims v. Sheriff-Shelby County
as 9:2024cv00215
Respondent:
Sheriff-Shelby County
Petitioner:
Tammy Sue Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Addison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01137
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Wesley K. Addison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klotz V. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv04508
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Plaintiff:
Wendel Klotz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Head
as 6:2024cv00044
Respondent:
Warden Head
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maldonado v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00479
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Genaro Martinez Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medrano v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00428
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Arturo S. Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guevara v. Garland et al
as 4:2024cv04467
Respondent:
Bret Bradford, Joe Corley Processing Center, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Petitioner:
Robinson A. Guevara
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Hughes v. Taylor
as 4:2024cv04470
Defendant:
Buck Taylor
Petitioner:
Candy Hill Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pleasant v. Lumpkins
as 4:2024cv04484
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkins
Petitioner:
Jerome Fisher Pleasant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Rolan Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
