US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 182
Jones v. Nunley
as 3:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Eiko Jones
Respondent:
Acting Warden Nunley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thompson v. Underwood et al
as 5:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Aaron Granville Thompson
Defendant:
Jennifer Underwood, Dr. Emmanuel Adams and Warden, FCI Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Prigmore v. Brown et al
as 3:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
William Prigmore
Defendant:
Acting Warden S. Brown, FCI Hazelton Staff, Multiple Unknown Agents of FBOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Freeland v. Lowe
as 5:2022cv00220
Petitioner:
Aron Freeland
Respondent:
Lt. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eakle v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
David Eakle
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francisco v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Ryan Francisco
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamb v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Virgil Lamb
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LeCron v. SFF Hazelton
as 3:2022cv00142
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Ridge LeCron
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hedrick v. Jividen et al
as 5:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Tanner Hedrick
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, West Virginia Department of Correction an Rehabilitation, John Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Egan v. McCaffrey
as 3:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Crystal Egan
Respondent:
Mr. McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
