Cases 41 - 50 of 567,095
Marquis v. Taylor
as 7:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
DeVonte Davis Marquis
Defendant:
A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Keller
as 7:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Demosthenese A. Wesley
Defendant:
Officer A.W. Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. District 39 Probation Office et al
as 7:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Eugene Junior Kimble
Defendant:
District 39 Probation Office, Harrisonburg Circuit Courts and Harrisonburg Commonwealth Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv01681
Plaintiff:
Rwayne M. Walton
Defendant:
Angela L. Washington, Terrance Deanes and Suzanne Rouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hairston v. Secretary SSA
as 1:2024cv01682
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hairston
Defendant:
Secretary SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Watson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner:
James Watson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Service et al
as 1:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
Vander Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Service, Roxbury Correctional Institution and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SELLERS v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
TYQASHIA SELLERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON THOMPSON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
