Cases 1 - 10 of 333,740
Gomes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024at00724
Plaintiff:
Victoria Lee Gomes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hanna et al
as 2:2024cv04838
Petitioner:
Kamy Hanna and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Heather Ranee Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Neal v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Neal, II
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Conness v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Matthew Russell Conness
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heth v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01597
Plaintiff:
Madison L Heth
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Newson (PS) v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Laquesha Newson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
O'Dell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Diana O'Dell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Francis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv03148
Plaintiff:
Christopher Francis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Permenter v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Permenter
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
