Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Scales v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2022cv07859
Plaintiff:
William Scales
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scales v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2022cv09683
Plaintiff:
William Scales
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Oranye et al
as 4:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Chantel Antoinette Johnson
Defendant:
Achike Christopher Oranye, Pinda McCoy, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Caudle v. AT&T Inc et al
as 5:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, T Mobile AG, Apple Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-2121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., SAP AMERICA, INC. and others
Miller v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Timothy Miller
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Microsoft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Harvey et al
as 2:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Michael Maxwell Hill, King Michael Tutankhaman and Grand Royal Prince Michael Dompledore, III
Defendant:
Markus Harvey, Marcos Harvey, Cameron Rye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kirsha Brown v. Coca-Cola, et al
as 22-12176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRSHA BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
COCA-COLA COMPANY, SPRITE, AMAZON.COM, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
