Cases 51 - 60 of 351,114
v. SeniorAge Area Agency on Aging et al
as 6:2024cv03175
Defendant:
SeniorAge Area Agency on Aging
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cox
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Long v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Nathan Eugene Long
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Monath v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Daniel Heath Monath
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ruff v. DRM Inc.
as 8:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Alex Ruff
Defendant:
DRM Inc. doing business as Arby's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Welch v. Staggs et al
as 8:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch
Defendant:
Don A. Staggs, Cindy Bassett and Zachery Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Meyers
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SOREIDOM S.A.R.L. v. HANSEN-MUELLER CO.
as 8:2024cv00240
Petitioner:
SOREIDOM S.A.R.L.
Respondent:
HANSEN-MUELLER CO.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Brooks v. Dolgencorp LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Brooks
Defendant:
Dolgencorp LLC doing business as Dollar General, Rozier Construction Company, Arkansas Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 Environmental Matters
Syperda v. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Michael Syperda
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, Chris Tripp, Michael Breese and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
