Cases 51 - 60 of 38,415
Thorson et al v. Cahlin et al
as 0:2024cv03701
Plaintiff:
Amy Allene Thorson and Karley Jo Thorson
Defendant:
Cristie Cahlin and Julie Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01269
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Black v. JSP Leasing, LLC
as 4:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Beverly Jean Black
Defendant:
JSP Leasing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Albolino
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Officer K Albolino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Robert v. Syracuse Police Department
as 1:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Syracuse Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Carney v. Welch et al
as 4:2024cv00792
Defendant:
Morgan E Welch, Doctors Company, Central Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute Inc doing business as CARTI and others
Plaintiff:
John Michael Carney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
