Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Southard v. Barr et al
as 3:2017cv03010
Plaintiff:
Benny Southard
Defendant:
Wess Barr, Beck, Durr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Boone County Missouri et al
as 2:2016cv04270
Plaintiff:
Glen Earl Lewis
Defendant:
Boone County Missouri, Boone County MO Elected Officials, Boone County MO Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mikutis et al
as 2:2016cv01319
Plaintiff:
Travis Delaney Williams
Defendant:
Kurt Mikutis, Denise Jarvela, Darron Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Hatcher et al
as 3:2016cv02590
Plaintiff:
Justin E. Lee
Defendant:
Lisa Hatcher, f/n/u Witherspoon, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvis v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
James Jarvis
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC , Corizon Health, Inc. , Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beggs v. Burean County et al
as 4:2016cv04102
Plaintiff:
Brian Beggs
Defendant:
Sheriff Burean County , Bureau County , Dr. Karen Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinderliter v. Stewart Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00882
Plaintiff:
Rodney Hinderliter, Jr.
Defendant:
Lisa Hatcher, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and Jason Ballenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Warkins et al
as 8:2016cv00208
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Julie Warkins and Dan Williams
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 2:2016mc00015
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Dan Williams , Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Brazelton v. Tippecanoe County Sheriff et al
as 4:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Lamonte Brazelton
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Sheriff , Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. , Nurse J Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
