Cases 171 - 180 of 195
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv60486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Marco's Franchising, LLC v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00649
Plaintiff:
Marco's Franchising, LLC, Marco's Franchising, LLC and Marco's Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Doctor's Associates Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Neverett
as 1:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates, Inc. and Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Debbie A. Neverett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Marco's Franchising, LLC v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.
as 3:2007cv03362
Plaintiff:
Marco's Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Jain et al v. Rosebud Sioux Tribal Court et al
as 3:2007cv03026
Plaintiff:
Narender Jain and Medical Doctor Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Rosebud Sioux Tribal Court, Sherman Marshall and Janet Sierra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bogert et al v. Doctor's Associates et al
as 4:2006cv02425
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
