Cases 101 - 110 of 195
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. PATEL et al
as 3:2012cv03505
Plaintiff:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
HINA R. PATEL, JENIS PATEL and JEDIRAVI, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00418
Plaintiff:
DietGoal Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. , ABP Corporation , Bojangle's Restaurants Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Doctor's Associates Inc , Kraft Foods Inc. and Rodale, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
DietGoal Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. PATEL et al
as 3:2012cv02903
Plaintiff:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
BHAVESH PATEL and SHRI KRISHNA INVESTMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doctor's Associates Inc. v. Badran
as 2:2012cv12009
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates Inc.
Defendant:
Kevin Badran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. ALAIGH et al
as 2:2012cv01422
Plaintiff:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
RAMAN ALAIGH and AF&B, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. PATEL et al
as 2:2012cv01375
Plaintiff:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
KRUPA B. PATEL and BEKRUDE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. KHAN et al
as 2:2012cv01216
Plaintiff:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
RUHILA KHAN and SHAYAN FOOD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Shivraj Enterprises LLC
as 3:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Shivraj Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
