Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 121 - 130 of 49,526
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00967
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00980
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Konick, Trustee v. Board of Supervisors of Rappahannock County
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff: David L. Konick, Trustee
Defendant: Board of Supervisors of Rappahannock County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Respess et al v. VMI Alumni Association
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: William L. Respess, Dean Barr, Hugh P. Brien and others
Defendant: VMI Alumni Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Jacobi Allen v. US
as 24-1519
Plaintiff: THOMAS C. JACOBI ALLEN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1518
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Santos v. Khoury et al
as 0:2024cv03381
Plaintiff: Stephen Santos
Defendant: Judge Coreen Khoury, Chester County Family Court, Governor Henry McMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03380
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moses v. Corum et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff: Corey Te'Darrell Moses
Defendant: Mark Wallace Corum, Town of Cramerton and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?