Cases 31 - 40 of 820
Varnell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (JRG2)
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Varnell
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Hannigan v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01994
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hannigan
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Joseph Mattingly v. R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC, et al
as 22-5794
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH BRENT MATTINGLY
Defendant / Appellee:
R.J. CORMAN RAILROAD GROUP, LLC, R.J. CORMAN RAILROAD SERVICES, LLC and R.J. CORMAN RAILROAD COMPANY/MEMPHIS LINE, aka R.J. Corman Railroad Company/Memphis Line, Inc
Rowe v. McDonough
as 2:2022cv11768
Plaintiff:
Tonya Rowe
Defendant:
Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 790 Rehabilitation of Labor
Gregg v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (TV1)
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Heath L. Gregg
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Marrero v. Veterans Administration et al
as 1:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, Christopher Robey, Myron Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reineke v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
as 2:2022cv10953
Plaintiff:
David Reineke
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Viola v. Kasaris et al
as 1:2022cv00559
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Anthony Viola
3Rd Party Defendant:
Daniel Kasaris, Arvin Clar, Jay Milano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McLeod v. Bryant et al
as 2:2022cv10729
Plaintiff:
John Michael McLeod
Defendant:
Michael Bryant and Internal Revenue Service
Singleteary v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Dylan L. Singleteary
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
