Cases 161 - 170 of 548,890
Morgan #313765 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Gary Morgan #313765
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Clark and Unknown Reddin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cole v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Cole
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, CoreCivic, Trousdale Turner Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly et al v. Liberty Mutual Auto and Home Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Roy Kelly and Rufta Aron
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Auto and Home Services, LLC and Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
TurboCode LLC v. Advantage Cellular Systems, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
TurboCode LLC
Defendant:
Advantage Cellular Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Smith v. Sexton
as 2:2024cv02431
Petitioner:
Travis Smith
Respondent:
David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. USA
as 1:2024cv01044
Petitioner:
Franklin M. Bryant
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Berry v. Sullivan County Jail et al
as 1:2024mc00028
Plaintiff:
Jason Berry
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail, Jeff Cassidy and Richard S. Venable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rankin v. USA
as 2:2024cv11620
Petitioner:
John Rankin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Simmons v. Moore et al
as 2:2024cv11609
Petitioner:
La Tausha Simmons
Respondent:
Michael Moore and Royal Oak, City of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
