Cases 141 - 150 of 351,219
Howard v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Norris B Howard, Sr
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Jimmy Hudson, Joseph Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing et al v. Metro Transit Train et al
as 0:2024cv02421
Plaintiff:
Kevon Ewing, Lachica Ousley and K.C.
Defendant:
Metro Transit Train, Metro Police, Metropolitan Council, the and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Yusuf Jones
as 24-2262
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Yusuf John Jones
Kasper Dobbs v. United States
as 24-2264
Petitioner:
Kasper Lamar Dobbs
Respondent:
United States of America
Adolfo Avila, Jr. v. Paul Schnell, et al
as 24-2261
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Gutierrez Avila, Jr., on behalf of 44 listed members (similarly situated)
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Being sued in his/her individual capacity; Being sued jointly and severally liable, Vicki Janssen, Being sued in his/her individual capacity; Being sued jointly and severally liable, Jeanette Wilson, Being sued in his/her individual capacity; Being sued jointly and severally liable and others
IA Migrant Movement for Justice, et al v. Brenna Bird, et al
as 24-2263
Plaintiff:
Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice, Jane Doe and Elizabeth Roe
Defendant:
Brenna Bird, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Iowa, Kimberly Graham and Zach Herrmann
Lesy Vasquez de Leon v. Merrick Garland
as 24-2247
Petitioner:
Lesy Vasquez de Leon
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Tommy Johnson, Jr.
as 24-2248
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tommy Lee Johnson, Jr.
United States v. Amon Freeman
as 24-2252
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amon Freeman
United States v. Ramon Penunuri-Noriega
as 24-2253
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ramon Penunuri-Noriega
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
