Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 231,329
Moore v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00162
Petitioner: Charles Allen Moore, Jr
Respondent: Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pugh v. Devos et al
as 3:2024cv05376
Plaintiff: Lisa Marie Pugh
Defendant: Keith Devos, Tabitha Yockey, Shawn Candella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap #124173 v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv01132
Plaintiff: Larry Donnell Dunlap
Defendant: Siji Thomas and Naphcare Incoporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa #350727 v. Unknown Parties et al
as 4:2024cv00248
Plaintiff: Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant: Unknown Parties, Arizona, State of, Ryan Thornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02937
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02940
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin TerVeer v. Cuevas Plus the People et al
as 2:2024cv04059
Petitioner: Justin TerVeer
Respondent: Cuevas the People and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branigh v. Richardson
as 1:2024cv00247
Plaintiff: Leotis B Branigh, III
Defendant: Warden Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonning v. Clifford
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff: Amy Rose Bonning
Defendant: Matthew Clifford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01390
Petitioner: Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?