Cases 71 - 80 of 158,600
Hill v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hill
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Appleby v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Michelle Appleby
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06359
Plaintiff:
Glendon J Riley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vesa v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06360
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jo-Ellen Vesa
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
THOMPSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON THOMPSON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Pomerantz v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Susan M Pomerantz
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
DAWN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
DAWN MONTES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Muniz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2024cv60578
Plaintiff:
Cossette Cunillera Muniz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Northern v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Northern
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CHISOLM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04929
Plaintiff:
TYREEK CHISOLM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
