Cases 111 - 120 of 87,755
Swarthout v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Matthew Swarthout
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Long v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02102
Petitioner:
James Long and James Robert Long
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neal v. Carter et al
as 5:2024ct03138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal and Christopher Lee Neal
Defendant:
RN Teresa Carter, P.A. Erica Kearney, Nurse Cora Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZABOROWSKI v. GOBBLE et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
CONRAD WILLIAM ZABOROWSKI
Respondent:
CANDACE GOBBLE and ALAMANCE COUNTY DSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DECCA CONTRACT FURNITURE LLC v. INTERIOR INVESTMENTS, LLC
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
DECCA CONTRACT FURNITURE LLC
Defendant:
INTERIOR INVESTMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JONES v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ROBERT JONES
Defendant:
THE CITY OF GREENSBORO and GREENSBORO FIRE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CARTER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE CARTER, III
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MOORE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00462
Petitioner:
ARCHIE FULTON MOORE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
