Cases 81 - 90 of 1,184,689
Amaya v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv03828
Petitioner:
Daniel Amaya
Respondent:
Chance Jones, Latoya Hughes and Kwame Raoulm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2024cv03822
Plaintiff:
Amireon Williams
Defendant:
John D. Idleburg, N. Kalfas and Gholar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50176
Plaintiff:
Dan Smith
Defendant:
Director Latoya Hughes, Warden Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
Trent Allen Williams
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. (lnu) (1) et al
as 5:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2), Johnson County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowling v. Spohn et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Roger Bowling
Defendant:
Nathan Spohn, Unknown James and Unknown Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst
as 0:2024cv01718
Plaintiff:
Enahi Beiza-Denova
Defendant:
Thomas Hollenhorst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Simpson County Adult Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Howard Leon Mayes, III and Duke
Defendant:
Simpson County Adult Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. District Court et al
as 6:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Steven Gene Johnson
Respondent:
U.S. District Court and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Koerner v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kelly Koerner
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
