Cases 1 - 10 of 238
Goneau et al v. Cannon et al
as 1:2024cv12332
Defendant:
Shaun Peterson, Scott Smith, Austin Alves and others
Plaintiff:
Tre T. Goneau and Melissa Goneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMALL v. BINGHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00313
Defendant:
TOWN OF BINGHAM, STEVEN STEWARD and DEPUTY ASHLEY SMITH
Plaintiff:
DAIGAN C SMALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. Egan et al
as 1:2024cv11794
Plaintiff:
Billy Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, LLC and Kenneth Egan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cantrell v. Brunswick Maine Police, et al
as 24-1522
Defendant:
ZACHARY HUBER, PATRICK SCOTT, CORY ILES and others
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Howard v. Bisenius, et al
as 24-1502
Defendant:
CYNTHIA JEAN AZIZ, DR. ANDREW KUMIN, MICHAEL G. XAVIER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. HOWARD
Cronan v. The State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Defendant:
Daniel Ballirano, Kerry Travers, Rep Terri Cortvriend and others
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cronan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Landry v. Rhode Island State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Ana Cristina Cola, Rhode Island State Police, Lt. R. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Norman J. Landry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Brooks v. Town of Worthington et al
as 3:2024cv30024
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Brooks
Defendant:
Town of Worthington, Charles S. Rose, Amy C. Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
