Cases 51 - 60 of 583
Nail v. JB Partners CS, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Contessa Nail
Defendant:
JB Partners CS, LLC d/b/a Dunkin' Donuts, Dunkin' Donuts, Inc. and JB Partners CS, LLC doing business as Dunkin' Donuts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv14497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Rader v. Dunkin Donuts Co et al
as 2:2021cv01274
Defendant:
Dunkin Donuts Co, Travelers Insurance, Dunkin Donuts Franchising LLC (DE) and others
Plaintiff:
Larry W Rader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHINGS LLC et al v. VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SOMERDALE LLC et al
as 1:2021cv17719
Plaintiff:
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHINGS LLC, DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC and DD IP HOLDER LLC
Defendant:
VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SOMERDALE LLC, VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS TURNERSVILLE LLC, VICKY AND CONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SEWELL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv14225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
