Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Gould et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 3:2024cv30033
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elliot Gould and Jonathan Chad Brown
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Jonathan Kane, Maria C. Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph v. Rhode Island State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tamara Joseph
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, State Police Department, Colonel Darnell S. Weaver, State Trooper Michael Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KANE v. DHHS
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC LEO KANE
Defendant:
DHHS
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
POOLE v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY POOLE
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, SCOTT KANE, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ra dais deapocalypse bey v. Kane, et al
as 22-1863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RA DAIS DEAPOCALYPSE BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNATHAN KANE, EAVON VAUGHAN and JONATHAN KANE
ra dais deapocalypse bey v. Kane et al
as 3:2022cv30092
Plaintiff:
ra dais deapocalypse bey
Defendant:
Johnathan Kane and Eavon Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARNEY et al v. HANCOCK COUNTY MAINE et al
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
FRANK L SHEP ARD, AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC, KAYLA DUMOND and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA E WINCHELL, ESQ and STEW ART CARNEY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kane v. Mass General Hospital
as 1:2020cv11266
Defendant:
Mass General Hospital
Plaintiff:
Patricia Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kane v. Heroux
as 1:2018cv11489
Defendant:
Paul Heroux
Plaintiff:
Dennis T. Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
