Cases 31 - 40 of 1,150
Vitaly Borker v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv10045
Petitioner:
Vitaly Borker
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. Terrico et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dari Garcia
Defendant:
Dr. Christine Terrico, Dr. Christopher Salas, NP Taborelli Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laurence, Jr. v. Nerohna et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence, Jr.
Defendant:
Peter F Nerohna, Wayne T. Salisbury Jr., Rachel C. Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angulo-Mero v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Humberto E. Angulo-Mero
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Foistner v. FMC Devens, Warden
as 1:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Foistner
Respondent:
FMC Devens, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lopez Astaiza v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00554
Petitioner:
Azael Lopez Astaiza
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cook v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00550
Petitioner:
John Cook
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cuero v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00551
Petitioner:
Genaro Cuero
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Deras Lopez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00552
Petitioner:
Jose Daniel Deras Lopez
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pineda-Martinez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00555
Petitioner:
Frixon Eduardo Pineda-Martinez
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
