Cases 61 - 70 of 16,158
Owl Feather- Gorbey v. District of Columbia et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather- Gorbey, Michael S. Gorbey and Tsunami Khan
Defendant:
District of Columbia, D.C Circuit Federal Courts, 2nd Circuit Federal Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
THATCHER v. USA
as 2:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
MATTHEW THATCHER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Waltermeyer v. Luna, et al
as 24-1355
Plaintiff:
BROC T. WALTERMEYER
Defendant:
DIANE L. KISLER and RICHARD A. LUNA, Warden, FCI Berlin
Duarte v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, PATRICK W. MCDERMOTT, Acting Sheriff, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office, DANIELLE FRANE, Superintendent, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office and others
Gamble Williams v. Boston Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv10701
Plaintiff:
Theodore Gamble Williams
Defendant:
Boston Police Department, Boston Police Officer John Doe and Boston Police Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Berkshire Medical Center, Inc.
as 3:2024cv30041
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Jennings, Jr.
Defendant:
Berkshire Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguiar v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv10987
Petitioner:
Stephen Aguiar
Respondent:
Fred Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson-Bey v. FCI Berlin
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Maurice M. Johnson-Bey
Defendant:
FCI Berlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
