Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00550
Petitioner:
John Cook
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al v. Paiva
as 23-1919
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE PAIVA
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. PALMIGIANO, WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN, JOHN F. PIERCE and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DAY, WILLIAM THOMAS, DANIEL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RI
Interested Party:
KENNETH WILSON, CHRISTOPHER HADLEY, NORMAN WHEELER and others
Cook v. Albano
as 3:2020cv30166
Defendant:
Albano
Plaintiff:
Michael A Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Bowler et al
as 3:2020cv30164
Defendant:
Sheriff Bowler and Albano
Plaintiff:
Michael Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Spaulding
as 1:2019cv12054
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Petitioner:
Vivian Troy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2019cv11982
Plaintiff:
Derek Thomas
Defendant:
Scott Murray, Corey Pointer, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middleton v. Murray, M.D. et al
as 1:2019cv11330
Defendant:
Garcia, Scott Murray, M.D., Cooke and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Middleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. Turco et al
as 3:2018cv30137
Defendant:
Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Health Services, Inc., Nadine Amato, Stephanie Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Duane E Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendall v. Murray et al
as 1:2018cv10141
Plaintiff:
Steven N. Kendall
Defendant:
Scoot Murray,MD , B. Yeh , Mr. Kapatos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
