Cases 121 - 130 of 473
Saad Maura, et al v. Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, et al
as 20-1114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMARIS TORRES-NUNEZ, EVELYN MORALEZ-SUAREZ, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP BERRIOS-RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BANCO SANTANDER DE PUERTO RICO, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
WMPRRE LLC and SUNWEST MORTGAGE COMPANY INC.
Colegio de Abogados y Abogadas de Puerto Rico et al v. Steidel-Figueroa et al
as 3:2019cv02135
Plaintiff:
Yamilette Vargas-Hernandez, Loharina Velazquez-Castro, Alejandro Torres-Rivera and others
Defendant:
Sonnya Isabel Ramos-Zeno, Jose M. Orta-Valdez, Camille Rivera-Perez and others
Interested Party:
Puerto Rico Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Varga v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00588
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Janos Varga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Burgos-Amador
as 19-2060
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Not Yet Classified:
JEDRICK H. BURGOS AMADOR
Defendant:
JOSE MULERO-VARGAS
Vargas-Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv02004
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ana Celia Vargas-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Seda-Vargas et al v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01932
Plaintiff:
Abel Jesus Maisonet-Aponte, Migda Liz Seda-Vargas and Conjugal Partnership Maisonet-Seda
Defendant:
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Mulero-Vargas v. US, et al
as 19-1941
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MULERO-VARGAS, a/k/a Jose A. Mulero-Vargas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Celestino Amaro-Figueroa et al
as 3:2019cv01596
Defendant:
Ramona Vargas Rivera, Conjugal Parnership Amaro-Vargas, Celestino Amaro-Figueroa and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
