Cases 11 - 20 of 22
RUSSELL v. CHENEVERT
as 2:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
JULIA RUSSELL
Defendant:
PHILLIP AUGUSTUS CHENEVERT, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Agyeah v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2021cv40020
Defendant:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Michael W. McGrath, Michael F. Ryder and others
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Agyeah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Worcester Interfaith, Inc. et al v. City of Worcester, Massachusetts et al
as 4:2021cv40015
Plaintiff:
Nelly Medina, Ruth Rodriguez-Fay, Delia Vega and others
Defendant:
Candy Mero-Carlson, John Stewart, Worcester Board of Election Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Casey et al v. Baker et al
as 4:2020cv10916
Defendant:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Charles D. Baker and Steven M. Sargent
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Casey and Adams Square Baptist Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv10916
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Kristopher Casey and Adams Square Baptist Church
Defendant:
Charles D. Baker and Steven M. Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz et al v. Devlin et al
as 4:2016cv40039
Plaintiff:
Marianne Diaz , N.M. , B.A. and others
Defendant:
James P. Devlin , Nicholas E. Nason , Jeffrey Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado-Pagan v. Negron-Fernandez
as 16-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIANO MALDONADO-PAGAN
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L. ORTIZ-HADDOCK, VICENTE GARCIA-GONZALEZ, AUGUSTUS CHRISTOPHER LIND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE R. NEGRON FERNANDEZ, Administrator of the Juvenile Institution Administration and CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION
McNamee v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 13-1518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MCNAMEE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Interested Party:
JAMES P. MCGOVERN and EDWARD M. AUGUSTUS, JR.
US v. Okoye
as 12-2045
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
AUGUSTUS C. OKOYE, a/k/a Chinedu Okoye
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
