Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Gotspace Data LLC et al v. NE Edge, LLC et al.
as 1:2022cv12215
Plaintiff:
Gotspace Data LLC, Got Capital, LLC, Gotspace Data Partners and others
Defendant:
Gotspace Development, LLC, NE Edge, LLC, NSO Group Technologies Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Town of Barnstable v. O'Connor, et al
as 14-1597
Defendant:
ANN BERWICK, in her official capacity as Chair of the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, MARK SYLVIA, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources and DAVID W. CASH, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities
Plaintiff:
KELLER COMPANY, INC., JAMIE REGAN, SANDRA P. TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARNSTABLE, MA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOLETTE A. WESTBROOK, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, CAPE WIND ASSOCIATE, LLC and others
Hyannis Marine, et al v. O'Connor, et al
as 14-1598
Defendant:
ANN BERWICK, in her official capacity as Chair of the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, MARK SYLVIA, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources and DAVID W. CASH, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities
Plaintiff:
KELLER COMPANY, INC., SANDRA P. TAYLOR, BARNSTABLE, MA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOLETTE A. WESTBROOK, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, ANGELA M. O'CONNOR, in her official capacity as Chair of the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, DAN BURGESS, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND, JAMIE REGAN and HYANNIS MARINA, INC.
Bourassa v. Armey, et al
as 21-1598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JON BOURASSA
Defendant:
MASSCOR OPTICAL INDUSTRIES, MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent at The North Central Correctional Institution, DAVID R. TOWER, Optical Industries Instructor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHELEE ARMEY, Optical Industries Instructor, JASON HAYDEN, Inner Parameter Security Officer and ASHLEE ARMEY, Optical Industries Instructor
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Hayden v. Magnusson
as 20-1902
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOEL A. HAYDEN
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, Warden, Maine State Prison
Fore River Res Against Com Sta, et al v. FERC
as 20-1458
Interested Party:
EVERSOURCE ENERGY, STOP THE ALGONQUIN PIPELINE EXPANSION, CHRISTOPHER WILSON and others
Petitioner:
REBECCA HAUGH, District One Town Councilor, QUINCY, MA, FORE RIVER RESIDENTS AGAINST THE COMPRESSOR STATION (FRRACS) and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 19-1220
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS GARNETT, Corrections Officer, KEITH PLOURD, Corrections Officer, TRACY MARTIN, Corrections Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant:
MAINE STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MAINE and WAYNE KLINE, Deputy Sheriff
Hayden v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv12578
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Bobby Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bourassa v. Masscor Optical Industries et al
as 4:2018cv40152
Defendant:
Ashelee Armey, Timothy Zabeck, Michael Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Jon Bourassa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
