Cases 11 - 20 of 116
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Benitez Caceres et al v. Magaziner et al
as 1:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Mirca Benitez Caceres and Guillermo Caceres
Defendant:
Seth Magaziner and Albert J. Vitali
Roza v. Lavigne et al
as 1:2022cv11542
Plaintiff:
Regina Roza
Defendant:
Seth Lavigne, Casey Holmes and City of Taunton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BLEWITT v. USA
as 1:2022cv00241
Petitioner:
SETH J BLEWITT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CAREY v. ETRADE INC
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
SETH T CAREY
Defendant:
ETRADE INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
CROSSON v. WATERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
WATERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SETH ROLFE, JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis et al v. Abramson
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Robert Patrick Lewis, Philip A Luelsdorff, 1AP, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Seth Abramson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Clervrain et al v. Raimondo et al.
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Fridelyne Maisoneuve
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jack Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MANTER v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
LLEWELLYN C MANTER
Defendant:
SETH A MCLEAN-WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
