Cases 11 - 20 of 72
US, ex rel. Nargol & Langton, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 22-1182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., Known now as Medical Device Business Services, Inc., DEPUY, INC., Known now as DePuy Synthes, Inc. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
US, ex rel. Nargol & Langton, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 22-1047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., Known now as Medical Device Business Services, Inc., DEPUY, INC., Known now as DePuy Synthesis, Inc., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. American Airlines Group Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11558
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, State of Arizona, State of California and others
Defendant:
American Airlines Group Inc. and JetBlue Airways Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Amie v. The State of California
as 3:2020cv01416
Defendant:
The State of California
Plaintiff:
Erin Ramon Amie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lestage v. Coloplast, Corp.
as 19-2037
Defendant:
COLOPLAST A/S, CCS MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC., BYRAM MEDICAL SUPPLIES and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROSEFF, KIMBERLY HERMAN, UNITED STATES, ex rel. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMY LESTAGE
Interested Party:
KENNY NACHWALTER, PA and PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
COLOPLAST, CORP.
Union of Concerned Scientists, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1383
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE, MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS and ELIZABETH ANN SHEPPARD
United States of America v. MALLINCKRODT ARD LLC
as 1:2018cv11931
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT PHARMACEUTICALS INC., MALLINCKRODT ARD LLC, QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Simmons v. State of California et al
as 1:2018cv11739
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
Executive Admintrative Agents, Directors Officials Officers and Agencies, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al
as 18-1545
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
Gould, et al v. Morgan, et al
as 17-2202
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., CHRISTOPHER HART, SARAH ZESCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL C. O'LEARY, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, MARK MORGAN, Acting Chief of the Brookline Police Department and others
Petitioner:
ALAN B. MORRISON and JACK RAKOVE
Plaintiff:
IRWIN CRUZ and MARKUS VALLASTER
Defendant:
DAVID A. PROVENCHER, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the New Bedford Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
