Cases 21 - 30 of 110
Kraljevich v. Courser Athletics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv11430
Plaintiff:
John Kraljevich
Defendant:
COURSER ATHLETICS, INC., Michael Petry, GREGG SPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Penate v. Kaczmarek, et al
as 22-1551
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLANDO PENATE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH BALLOU, ROBERT IRWIN and RANDY THOMAS
Defendant:
ANNE KACZMAREK, KRIS CONNOLLY FOSTER, RANDALL E. RAVITZ and others
Welter M.D., Ph.D. v. Medical Professional Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv11047
Plaintiff:
Ryan Welter M.D., Ph.D.
Defendant:
Medical Professional Mutual Insurance Company doing business as Coverys, Joseph Dickerson, Gregg Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Penate v. Kaczmarek, et al
as 22-1504
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROLANDO PENATE
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNE KACZMAREK
Defendant:
KRIS CONNOLLY FOSTER, RANDALL E. RAVITZ, JOSEPH BALLOU and others
Brayman v. Maguire
as 22-1299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN MAGUIRE and GREGG ELLIS
Defendant:
RAYMOND PORTER, GARY CRAFTS and GREG ELLIS
Suarez v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2022cv30027
Plaintiff:
Shazam Suarez
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Luke cournoyer, Jose A Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv40119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gregg v. Northeastern University et al
as 1:2021cv11495
Plaintiff:
Simone Gregg
Defendant:
Northeastern University, Paul Zernicke, Maryellen Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
