Cases 21 - 30 of 1,092
ROSS v. WOODCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
JUDGE WOODCOCK, MCCORMACK, BRYCE TURGENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS v. PIKE et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, D GRAY, JAQUES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSS v. MCCORMACK et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
ANDREW MCCORMACK, MJ MCFADDEN, SCOTT KELLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS v. MCCORMACK et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
ANDREW MCCORMACK, BRYCE TURGENSON, SCOTT LEE ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS et al v. BANGOR SAVINGS BANK et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS and BRIENNA ROWE
Defendant:
BANGOR SAVINGS BANK, TRESTEN BERGERON and GABRIELLE CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10713
Plaintiff:
Lavonna Lee
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryant v. Casey et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Vanuel Bryant
Defendant:
Sgt. Devan J. Casey, Lt. Keith Clarke, Major Dennis Skorski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irons-Hearn v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10635
Plaintiff:
Dawn Lee Irons-Hearn
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. Bank of America, et al
as 24-1149
Plaintiff:
HEEWON LEE
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
Amanda G. v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Amanda Lee Gray
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
