Cases 31 - 40 of 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv40111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Doyle v. Babine, Councilor, et al
as 20-1665
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN BABINE, councilor, in his individual and official capacities for the Town of Scarborough, Maine, MARY PEARSON, in her individual and official capacities for the Town of Scarborough, Maine and MUNICIPALITY OF SCARBOROUGH, ME
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. DOYLE
Doyle v. Babine, Councilor, et al
as 20-1584
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN BABINE, councilor, in his individual and official capacities for the Town of Scarborough, Maine, MARY PEARSON, in her individual and official capacities for the Town of Scarborough, Maine, MUNICIPALITY OF SCARBOROUGH, MAINE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. DOYLE
DOYLE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2020cv00191
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
LONA DOYLE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Doyle v. Homedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2019cv12491
Defendant:
Homedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
William Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOYLE v. BABINE, COUNCILOR et al
as 2:2019cv00469
Defendant:
SHAWN BABINE, COUNCILOR, MARY PEARSON and MUNICIPALITY OF SCARBOROUGH MAINE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Doyle, II et al
as 1:2019cv00317
Defendant:
James E. Doyle, II and Doyle Respiratory, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
DOYLE v. TOWN OF FALMOUTH
as 2:2019cv00229
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOYLE
Defendant:
TOWN OF FALMOUTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HORNOF et al v. WALLER et al
as 2:2019cv00198
Defendant:
JON D LAVALLEE, RICHARD UDELL, MICHAEL A FAZIO and others
Plaintiff:
JAROSLAV HORNOF, DAMIR KORDIC and LUKAS ZAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
