Cases 31 - 40 of 1,596
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe v. City of Holyoke et al
as 3:2024cv30018
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Holyoke and Anthony Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washburn v. USA
as 1:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Anthony Washburn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Castro v. Scanlan, et al
as 24-1097
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
DAVID SCANLAN, New Hampshire Secretary of State and DONALD J. TRUMP
Viola v. Transformative Healthcare, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10150
Plaintiff:
Anthony Viola
Defendant:
Transformative Healthcare, LLC and Coastal Medical Transportation Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Estate of Afonso Brandao v. Benvie et al
as 1:2024cv10147
Plaintiff:
Estate of Afonso Brandao
Defendant:
Daniel Benvie, Anthony Louis, Olegario Da Graca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hicks v. Coastal Medical Transportation Systems, LLC
as 1:2024cv10097
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hicks, Robyn Sharpe, Daniel Durgin and others
Defendant:
Coastal Medical Transportation Systems, LLC d/b/a Transformative Healthcare, LLC, Transformative Healthcare, LLC, Fallon Ambulance Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Barker v. Divris et al
as 1:2024cv10089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barker
Defendant:
Matthew Divris, Anthony Findley and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Fishman
as 24-1047
Petitioner:
DEBORAH FISHMAN
Respondent:
MASSACHUSETTS PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT, HONORABLE JUDGE CHRISTINE ANTHONY, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
