Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Rogers v. Ashe
as 3:2013cv30055
Petitioner:
Richard Rogers
Respondent:
Michael Ashe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parrott v. Ashe et al
as 3:2013cv30007
Plaintiff:
Gary Parrott
Defendant:
Michael Ashe and Deval Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Nickerson-Reti, et al v. Lexington Public Schools, et al
as 12-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA NICKERSON-RETI and CURTIS RETI
Defendant - Appellee:
LEXINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MINUTEMAN REGIONAL CAREER & TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION and others
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MITCHELL D. CHESTER, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education, LEXINGTON SCHOOL COMMITTEE and others
Rogers v. Ashe et al
as 3:2012cv30188
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Ashe and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASHE v. BADAMI
as 1:2012cv00218
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ASHE
Defendant:
ANGELA BADAMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnstein v. MVM, Inc.
as 1:2012cv10666
Plaintiff:
John H. Arnstein , Gerard R. Ashe , George William Barnet and others
Defendant:
MVM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Londonderry, NH, 5 Ash Street
as 1:2011cv00560
Defendant:
$41,399.00 US Currency and Londonderry, NH, 5 Ash Street
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Baggett et al v. Ashe et al
as 3:2011cv30223
Plaintiff:
Debra Baggett and April Marlborough
Defendant:
Michael J. Ashe and Patricia Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
