Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Hines v. Boston Public Schools
as 1:2015cv11897
Plaintiff:
Frances Hines
Defendant:
Boston Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winston v. Olivera et al
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Winston
Defendant:
Tony Olivera, Josephine Bird, Briann Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. SHEHAN et al
as 1:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
JOHN T HINES
Defendant:
THOMAS SHEHAN and SHERRY GDOVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester et al v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv10597
Plaintiff:
Louise Hester , Irene Hester and Felicia Hines
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordan et al v. Mass Mutual Life Insurance Co. et al
as 3:2013cv30184
Plaintiff:
Dennis Gordan , John Hine , Donna Flieger and others
Defendant:
Mass Mutual Life Insurance Co. , Roger Crandall, Stuart H. Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Hines v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03810
Plaintiff:
Richard Hines
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines et al v. Worcester Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv11291
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hines
Defendant:
Worcester Police Department, Robert O'Rourke, Carl Supernor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Bledsoe, et al
as 12-2246
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES M. MURRAY, a/k/a James Hines
Respondent - Appellee:
B.A. BLEDSOE, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Murray v. Bledsoe, et al
as 12-2245
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES M. MURRAY, a/k/a James Hines
Respondent - Appellee:
B.A. BLEDSOE and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Azubuko v. Hines et al
as 1:2012cv10772
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E Azubuko
Defendant:
Geraldine S. Hines, Christine M. Roach, Douglas Martland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
