Cases 41 - 50 of 149
Barrett v. Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv11410
Defendant:
Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew Barrett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Annick Roy, et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co, et al
as 17-1108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNICK ROY, as special administrator of the Estate of Jean-Guy Veilleux, deceased; individually and as next friend of minor FRV, SAMUEL AUDET, BELAND AUDET and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway, DELAWARE AND HUDSON RAILROAD COMPANY INC., d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway and others
Movant:
ROBERT JAMES KEACH
Aquino v. Fleming et al
as 1:2017cv10136
Plaintiff:
Charina Aquino
Defendant:
Saroj Fleming , Jennifer Bentwood , Elton Fennel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Barrett v. Integon National Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Linda Barrett
Defendant:
Integon National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrett v. Town of Plainville et al
as 1:2016cv12551
Plaintiff:
Julie Ann Barrett
Defendant:
Town of Plainville , James Alfred , Joseph DiRenzo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrett v. USA
as 1:2016cv00330
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barrett v. USA
as 1:2016cv00329
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Underwood v. Barrett, et al
as 16-1725
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VALENTINE UNDERWOOD
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICIA BARRETT, ANTHONY CATALANO, JEFFREY CLEMENT and others
Defendant:
DOUGLAS BOWER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SWEETS, f/k/a John Doe (Sweets), DONALD DENOMME and others
Underwood v. Spencer, et al
as 16-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VALENTINE UNDERWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
LUIS SPENCER, MICHAEL GRANT, JAMES J. SABA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
