Cases 41 - 50 of 50
beras-benitez v. cortez-perez et al
as 3:2009cv01791
Plaintiff:
rafael beras-benitez
Defendant:
elizabeth cortez-perez, edwin hernandez-veras, luis laracuente and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cortez-Rivera v. USA
as 3:2009cv01027
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Omar Cortez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Schofield v. Horsman et al
as 1:2008cv12026
Plaintiff:
Eugene Schofield
Defendant:
Donald Horsman, Rich Masciantonio, Gjon Nivica and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Quiksilver, Inc. et al v. Santiago et al
as 3:2008cv01912
Plaintiff:
Quiksilver, Inc., Quiksilver, Inc., Quiksilver, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Jesus Santiago, Oscar Rodriguez, Hector Figueroa-Khury and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Torres-Valle v. Toledo et al
as 3:2008cv01850
Plaintiff:
Wydisberto Torres-Valle
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo, Carlos Cortez-Hernandez, Bolivar Lafontaine and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cortez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02096
Plaintiff:
Amelia M. Cortez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Garcia-Mercado et al
as 3:2007cv01793
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Abraham Garcia-Mercado, Jane 1 Doe, Conjugal Partnership Garcia-Doe1 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2007md01842
Plaintiff:
Deborah June Bilbrey, Wendy H. Risley, Lois Askins and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc, WCO Medical Products Corporation, Baolien Nguyen Tu and others
Interested Party:
Ernest Cory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
