Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Erwin v. McDermott et al
as 1:2011cv11328
Plaintiff:
Dustin Erwin
Defendant:
Christopher McDermott, Darvin Anderson, City of Brockton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Petition to Appear on Behalf of the United States
as 3:2011mc00300
Petitioner:
Dustin M. Davis
HODGDON v. BARLOW et al
as 1:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN HODGDON
Defendant:
SHIRLEY BARLOW and CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HODGDON v. DOWNEAST CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2009cv00418
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN A HODGDON
Defendant:
DOWNEAST CORRECTIONAL FACILITY , SCOTT JONES and BEVERLY, OFC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Wake v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02424
Plaintiff:
Dustin R. Wake
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor, et al v. Airco, Inc., et al
as 07-2422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUNE A. TAYLOR, RUSSELL H. TAYLOR, DUSTIN H. TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
AIRCO, INC., AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, American Chemistry Council, f/k/a Chemical Manufacturi Chemical Manufacturing Association and the Manufacturing Chemists Association, BORDEN INC, CONOCOPHILLIPS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
