Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Dore et al v. Velazquez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv11964
Plaintiff: James Dore and Matthew Wheelock
Defendant: Velazquez , Prindle , Torrisi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lenz v. USA
as 1:2010cv00326
Petitioner: Daniel Moses Lenz
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Moses v. Mele We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00253
Defendant: Mark Mele
Plaintiff: Crystal Moses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moses v. O'Brien
as 1:2010cv10577
Petitioner: Prince Moses
Respondent: Steven O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Caldwell
as 10-1168
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: MOSES C. CALDWELL
Caldwell v. Wyatt Detention Facility et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff: Moses Caldwell
Defendant: Donald W Wyatt Detention Facility, Michael Fair, Tapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. MCNAMARA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00267
Plaintiff: VINCENT LEE ROBINSON
Defendant: DENNIS MCNAMARA, BARRY ANECHIARICO and JIM MOSES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bassie v. Holder
as 09-1052
Petitioner: MOSES COLE BASSIE, a/k/a Moses C. Bassie, a/k/a Moses Bassie
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
:
Huynh v. Worcester City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv40240
Plaintiff: Trung Huynh
Defendant: Worcester City of, Andrew Cravedi and William Mosely
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The First National Bank of Ipswich v. Moses et al
as 1:2008cv00408
Plaintiff: The First National Bank of Ipswich
Defendant: Gerald B. Moses and Carolyn R. Moses
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?