Cases 41 - 50 of 1,342
Vitaly Borker v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv10045
Petitioner:
Vitaly Borker
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benbow v. Officer Carnavale et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Aaron Benbow and Aaron C. Benbow
Defendant:
Officer Carnavale, Lt. Amaral, Deputy Warden Aul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Terrico et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dari Garcia
Defendant:
Dr. Christine Terrico, Dr. Christopher Salas, NP Taborelli Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laurence, Jr. v. Nerohna et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence, Jr.
Defendant:
Peter F Nerohna, Wayne T. Salisbury Jr., Rachel C. Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foistner v. FMC Devens, Warden
as 1:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Foistner
Respondent:
FMC Devens, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Angulo-Mero v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Humberto E. Angulo-Mero
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In Re: Mahoney
as 23-2095
Petitioner:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Respondent:
ERIC WILLIAMS, Warden, MCFP Springfield
Cuero v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00551
Petitioner:
Genaro Cuero
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Velez-Estupinan v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00558
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Velez-Estupinan
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schmitt v. Bowers
as 1:2023cv13203
Petitioner:
Thomas Schmitt
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
