Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
D. et al v. Chen et al
as 1:2012cv10066
Plaintiff:
William D. , Gail D. and N. M.
Defendant:
William Chen, John Ho, Vladimir Levichev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANAEME v. USA et al
as 1:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
CHIBUEZE C ANAEME
Defendant:
USA, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL AND FINANCIAL REGULATION, OFFICE OF LICENSING AND REGULATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCarthy v. USA
as 1:2011cv00289
Petitioner:
William D. McCarthy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
US v. Garcia-Varga
as 10-2330
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. GARCIA-VARGAS, a/k/a Brena
Gretsky v. Edelstein & Company, LLP et al
as 1:2010cv11122
Plaintiff:
Genna Gretsky
Defendant:
Edelstein & Company, LLP, William D. Mahoney and Scott B. Kaplowitch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Rogers et al v. Mulholland et al
as 1:2009cv00493
Plaintiff:
Margaret Rogers, Kathleen Church, Colleen Arneson and others
Defendant:
William D. Mulholland, James E. Doyle and Jack Carney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walsh v. Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company
as 1:2009cv10280
Plaintiff:
William D. Walsh
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rolland, et al v. Patrick, et al
as 08-1874
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ARC MASSACHUSETTS, LORRETTA ROLLAND, FREDERICK COOPER, by his mother and legal guardian, Minnie Humphries and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC VOSS, LAURA THIBAULT, FREDERICK CARTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDERICK A. LASKEY, Secretary of the Executive Office of Administration and Finance, WILLIAM D O'LEARY, Secretary of the Executive Office of Health and Human Services, BRUCE M. BULLEN, Commissioner of the Division of Medical Assistance and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
