Cases 71 - 80 of 1,880
Smith v. David
as 1:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Smith
Defendant:
Giulianna David
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
SMITH v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, TRACIE WASSON, JESSICA LUNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Minicucci
as 1:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Smith
Defendant:
Steven Minicucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Content v. Demeritt, et al
as 23-1616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISABELLE CONTENT
Plaintiff:
LEAH JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
C. DEMERITT, T. SMITH, F.C. ROGERS and others
Defendant:
HAVERHILL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Smith v. Judge Denise Casper et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Judge Denise Casper and U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv11660
Petitioner:
Steven L Smith
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CANTRELL v. BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, SCOTT STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Godofsky et al v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 1:2023cv11620
Plaintiff:
Barry Godofsky, Ruby Herndon and Michael Smith
Defendant:
Philips North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc. and Philips RS North America LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Smith v. Progress Software Corporation
as 1:2023cv11580
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ainooson v. O'Gara et al
as 1:2023cv11478
Plaintiff:
Justice E. Ainooson
Defendant:
James O'Gara, Sheila C Kelly, Joann Lynds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
