Cases 1 - 10 of 298
Duarte v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1543
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, PATRICK W. MCDERMOTT, Sheriff, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office, DANIELLE FRANE, Superintendent, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office and others
Silva v. Campbell et al
as 1:2024cv11412
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Silva
Defendant:
Judge William L Campbell, Judge Aleta Arthur Truger and S Carran Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ross v. Bangor Savings Bank, et al
as 24-1445
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS and BRIENNA ROWE
Defendant:
BANGOR SAVINGS BANK, TRESTEN BERGERON, Branch Manager of Skowhegan Branch and GABRIELLE CAMPBELL, Assistant Branch Manager of Skowhegan Branch
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Zinser v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2024cv10847
Petitioner:
Lawrence Zinser
Respondent:
Steve Kennedy and AGO Andrea Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
St. John v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv10646
Petitioner:
Sandra Natasha St. John
Respondent:
Andrea Joy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bloom v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv10339
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Bloom
Defendant:
William James Campbell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CAMPBELL
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
COLIN CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gerhard v. Reidy et al
as 1:2024cv10270
Plaintiff:
Jason Gerhard and Pro se litigant Jason Gerhard
Defendant:
Terrence Reidy and Andrea Joy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
