Cases 1 - 10 of 642
US v. Omoruyi
as 24-1562
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
OSAKPAMWAN HENRY OMORUYI, a/k/a Clifford Bernard, a/k/a Bernard Clifford
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. METHUSELAH TREE LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
METHUSELAH TREE LLC, ROBERT ROSS, RLR ENTERPRISES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Cronan v. Nerhona et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cronan
Defendant:
Peter Nerhona, Daniel Ballirano, Kerry Travers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Paz v. 2U, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11049
Plaintiff:
Henry De La Paz
Defendant:
2U, Inc. and edX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZEPF et al
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL L ZEPF, PATRICIA A ZEPF, HENRY A PYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Berrios v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10705
Plaintiff:
Henry Berrios
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Chavez v. Family Medical Leave Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv10328
Plaintiff:
Henry Chavez and Jardineira Betances
Defendant:
Family Medical Leave Massachusetts
Chavez v. Family Medical Leave Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv10330
Plaintiff:
Henry Chavez and Jardineira Betances
Defendant:
Family Medical Leave Massachusetts
Rochester v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv10210
Plaintiff:
James Henry Rochester
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sanchez-Bernal v. Capital Projects, Corp.
as 3:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Henry Sanchez-Bernal
Defendant:
Capital Projects, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
