Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Saada v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Amos Saada
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Caceres et al v. Amos Financial LLC
as 1:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Mirca Caceres and Guillermo Caceres
Defendant:
Amos Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Benitez Caceres et al v. Amos Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Mirca Benitez Caceres, Guillermo Caceres, Juan C. Caceres and others
Defendant:
Amos Financial, LLC, Department of Planning and Development and National Grid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00050
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Silvia v. Providence VA Medical Center, et al
as 21-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. SILVIA
Defendant:
PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER, ANNMARIE DUNICAN, Doctor and AMOS CHARLES, Doctor
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Samuel et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2021cv00430
Petitioner:
Amos Jayeola Samuel, Odunayo Ekundayo, Benoy Thomas and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Immigration Customs Enforcement, Daniel W. Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Silvia v. Providence VA Medical Center et al
as 1:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
David A. Silvia
Defendant:
Providence VA Medical Center, Dr. Charles Amos, Dr. Amos Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Don v. Alves
as 1:2021cv10468
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves
Petitioner:
Amos Don
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
