Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Amesbury v. Burnes, et al
as 23-1077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK E. AMESBURY, d/b/a Polytechnic
Defendant / Appellee:
HANNAH BURNES, RI State Fire Marshal, Investigator, DAVID GOLDSTEIN, Chief Fire Marshal, DONALD R. GREBIEN, Mayor and others
US v. Given
as 22-1588
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
CLIFTON GIVEN
Interested Party:
BLOCK PJS and SWEET SUGAR-PIA
Amesbury v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury d/b/a Polytecnic
Defendant:
Hannah Burnes, David Goldstein, Donald Grebien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Givens v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Givens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIVEN v. SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD LLC
as 2:2019cv00080
Defendant:
SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD LLC
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GIVEN
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Pearson et al v. Hodgson et al
as 1:2018cv11130
Plaintiff:
Kellie Pearson , Roger Burrell , Brian Givens and others
Defendant:
Thomas M Hodgson and Securus Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Given, et al v. O'Donnell, et al
as 13-1604
Plaintiff:
JOEL PENTLARGE and JEFFREY M. HEALEY, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD GIVEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH O'DONNELL, KATHLEEN DENNEHY, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Defendant:
NATAYLIA PUSHKINA
Healey, et al v. Dennehy, et al
as 13-1610
Plaintiff:
JOEL PENTLARGE and EDWARD GIVEN
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY M. HEALEY, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DENNEHY, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DEBORAH O'DONNELL and others
Defendant:
NATAYLIA PUSHKINA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
