Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bush, et al v. Fantasia, et al
as 22-1755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BUSH, LINDA TAYLOR, LISA TIERNAN and others
Plaintiff:
ANITA LOPEZ, IAN SAMPSON, JOSEPH PROVENZANO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LINDA FANTASIA, MARTHA FEENEY-PATTEN, ANTHONY MARIANO and others
Petitioner:
HEIDI KAITER and JILL OWENS
Bush et al v. Fantasia et al
as 1:2021cv11794
Plaintiff:
Michael Bush, Linda Taylor, Lisa Tiernan and others
Defendant:
Linda Fantasia, Martha Feeney-Patten, Anthony Mariano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Goddard et al
as 1:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Officer Goddard and Officer #311
Plaintiff:
E'Jai Bey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11653
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goddard v. Oden et al
as 1:2015cv00055
Plaintiff:
James Goddard
Defendant:
Oden, Leach, Kettle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Revolutions Medical Corporation v. Goddard et al
as 1:2014cv13130
Plaintiff:
Revolutions Medical Corporation
Defendant:
Andrew Goddard, Orlando Soto, Sean Albert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goddard v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., et al
as 1:2014cv11114
Plaintiff:
Jeff Goddard
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Revolutions Medical Corporation v. Goddard Technologies Inc.
as 1:2013cv10272
Plaintiff:
Revolutions Medical Corporation
Defendant:
Goddard Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Goddard v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03253
Plaintiff:
Lonnie R. Goddard
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
