Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
STAG Industrial Holdings, LLC v. Solar Seal LLC et al
as 1:2023cv11726
Plaintiff: STAG Industrial Holdings, LLC
Defendant: Solar Seal LLC, Naverra Glass LLC and O3 Industries LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Knox et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11695
Plaintiff: Thomas Knox, Rosemarie Knox and Bayer Cropscience Inc., Successor in interest to Amchem Products, Inc.
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alliance Laundry Systems LLC Individually and as successor-in-interest to American Laundry Machinery Co., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Columbia Boiler Company, Crane Co., Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: General Electric Company
Interested Party: Defendants Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
The Board of Trustees of the United Furniture Workers Pension Fund A v. Ventoux Industrial Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv30092
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the United Furniture Workers Pension Fund A
Defendant: Ventoux Industrial Holdings, LLC and Ventoux Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Mark Chamberlain et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10964
Defendant: Viking Pump, Inc., Asco Valve, SB Decking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mark Chamberlain and Judith Chamberlain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Michael Twombly v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10236
Defendant: Aurora Pump, Ford Motor Company, VAPOR POWER INTERNATIONAL and others
Cross Defendant: Crosby Valve, LLC, Crane Co., York International Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: General Electric Company, COPES VULCAN, INC., The Budd Company and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TWOMBLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILBUR TWOMBLY and Michael Twombly
3Rd Party Defendant: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Not Classified By Court: Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BRADFORD v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.
as 2:2019cv00128
Cross Defendant: CRANE COMPANY, WHEELER PROTECTIVE APPAREL INC, THE GAGE COMPANY and others
Defendant: DEZURIK INC, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Cross Claimant: CBS CORPORATION, ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION, RAINBIRD CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: MERLE WEST and JANICE E BRADFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
West v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2018cv00688
Defendant: Foster Wheeler LLC, Sears Roebuck & Co., Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company and others
Plaintiff: Janice Bradford West and Merle West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cupp v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10168
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, BW/IP, Inc., Warren Pumps LLC and others
Cross Claimant: Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: Ericsson, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Gail Cupp, James Cupp, Jason Cupp and others
Not Classified By Court: Robert B. Collings, Edward F. Harrington and Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Hardy v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2017cv10826
Defendant: Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: FMC Corporation and Bayer Cropscience, Inc.
Cross Defendant: Riley Power Inc., A. W. Chesterton Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Charles Hardy
Not Classified By Court: Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
In Re: Southgate
as 16-2206
Petitioner: JEREMY CHRISTOPHER SOUTHGATE
Respondent: SOUNDSPARK, INC, ANA VILLANUEVA, CHRISTOPHER NOLTE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?